[RDD] RD 2.0

Cowboy curt at gwis.com
Thu Jul 8 09:51:13 EDT 2010

On Thursday 08 July 2010 09:01:44 am Fred Gleason wrote:

> *All* is not a realistic goal: CPUs are inherently sequential devices, so
> no pure software solution will be able to achieve this.

 With the possible exception of a true real time system.
 Of course, those not used to *true* real time will be exceedingly
 annoyed by the apparent lack of responsiveness ( where a frozen
 GUI means nothing other than the RT routine is running ) and 
 likely by the minimum hardware requirements. ( lots and
 lots of RAM, for instance, and real fast CPU's plus the idea that
 anything with a hard disk can't, by definition, be *true* real time )
 ( well, it can, sorta, but takes even more RAM, and l-o-n-g
 relative deadlines )
 (( hey, if the deadline is next week, even Windows can be RT ))

 I'm with Fred on this. Reducing the "error" to the point of
 unnoticed insignificance is more realistic, and should be
 far more acceptable to the average user. 



Of what you see in books, believe 75%.  Of newspapers, believe 50%.
And of TV news, believe 25% -- make that 5% if the anchorman wears a

More information about the Rivendell-dev mailing list